5. How Are Charter Schools Managed?

October 30, 2026

Top Takeaways

More than half (55.4%) of all charter schools are self-managed.
More than half (50.5%) of all charter school students are enrolled in freestanding schools.
Most CMO-managed and freestanding charter schools are in urban areas.
CMO-managed schools enroll the highest share of Black and Hispanic students (75.8%) across management types.
EMO-managed schools enroll the smallest proportion of charter students (18.5%), yet are the fastest growing management type.

Management Organizations by State

Note: Data comes from 2024-25 and depicts the management organization types present in the state at that time. This map does not depict all the management types permitted under state law, only those operating in 2024-25. Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kentucky, and Vermont did not have any charter schools in the 2024-25 school year.

Most charter schools manage themselves.

In 2024-25, 55.4% of all charter schools are categorized as freestanding, meaning they manage school operations themselves.
44.6% of charter schools contract with external organizations for management-related services.

What are the Structures That Drive Charter School Operations?
We identified three unique overarching management structures for charter schools: freestanding, managed by a charter management organization (CMO), and managed by an education management organization (EMO). The National Alliance considers an organization to be a management organization if it: (1) manages at least three schools, (2) serves a minimum of 300 students, and (3) is a business entity separate from the schools it manages. We set the threshold at three, and not two, schools so we did not mistakenly classify an entity that serves two campuses within the same school, as a management organization.

Management organizations help schools with a variety of tasks and operations, including staffing, curriculum, services for students with disabilities, facilities, and back-office support, just like a district school may contract a third-party for these same services. Management structures and the relationships these external partners have with their schools vary considerably. In some cases, the management organizations provide limited services; in other cases, they may provide nearly all management-related services and directly hire educational staff. CMOs manage 34.8% of charter schools nationwide, while EMOs manage 13.6% of charter schools.

Starting 2024-25, new more granular management organization categories were introduced to capture the nuance of how schools are managed. Table 5.1 illustrates these new categories and the number of schools that are managed by multiple management organizations. In some of the summary statistics on this page, we combine categories for simplicity. Because some schools are managed by both a CMO and EMO, total percentages may not add up to 100%. The seven categories are defined below.

Management Organization Types

CMO: CMOs are nonprofit organizations. Schools working with these organizations often appear as unified networks with similar missions, educational models, and curriculum. However, this is not always the case: some CMOs manage schools with more diverse models and curricula. 
CMO/CMO: Cases in which schools contract with a CMO that then contracts with another CMO/nonprofit management organization.
EMO: EMOs are management organizations with a for-profit tax status, although it is incorrect to label the public schools that contract with them as “for-profit.”
EMO/EMO: Cases in which school contract with an EMO that then contracts with another EMO/for-profit management organization.
CMO/EMO: Cases in which a school contracts with one type of management organization directly and then that organization contracts with a different type of management organization. We most often see this as schools contracting with CMOs and those CMOs contract out to EMOs.
Freestanding: Independently management charter schools (not affiliated with any networks or management organizations).
Freestanding – Network: A group of charter schools that operate together, often sharing a name, branding, or curriculum, but do not meet the definition of a management organization, either because no separate business entity manages them or because the network is below the size thresholds (three schools and 300 students).

Table 5.1: Charter Management Organization Share

TOP TAKEAWAYS

CMOs far outnumber EMOs: there are 304 CMOs compared to 57 EMOs. However, CMOs tend to be much smaller organizations.

Proportionally more CMOs operate five or fewer schools (58.2%) than EMOs that operate five or fewer schools (35.1%).

Very large organizations are more prevalent among EMOs, with approximately 19.3% of EMOs managing 26 or more charter schools, whereas only 5.6% of CMOs operate 26 or more charter schools.

EMOs manage 24.4% of virtual charter schools and 36.6% of virtual school students attend these schools.

Both charter schools and district schools contract with for-profit educational service providers and EMOs for a wide range of services. A new charter school governing board that wants to partner with an EMO for a new school applies to an authorizer for a charter. If the authorizer approves the application, the board enters into a contract with the EMO to manage or provide other services for the school. Many EMOs serve as vendors for specific management-related services, such as back-office support, hosting web platforms, or staffing assistance. The charter school governing board may end their contract with the EMO at any time and still retain the charter. In other words, the school itself is not a company.

Eight of the 46 places (including states, territories, and D.C.) with charter school laws partially or fully prohibit charter school governing boards from partnering with EMOs in any capacity: California, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Washington. EMOs are also prohibited from receiving federal Charter Schools Program funds.

Table 5.2: Counts of Management Organizations by Number of Schools They Manage

Management Type	3 to 5 Schools and Campuses	6 to 15 Schools and Campuses	16 to 25 Schools and Campuses	26+ Schools and Campuses
CMO	177	98	12	17
EMO	20	19	7	11
Grand Total	197	117	19	28

Across all locale types, freestanding charter schools are by far the most common, followed by CMO-managed schools, and finally by EMO-managed schools.

TOP TAKEAWAYS

Freestanding charter schools make up more than half of all charter schools in each locale type and are by far the most well represented management type in rural and town areas. 77.9% of rural charter schools and 82% of town charter schools are freestanding schools.
Towns and rural areas held the smallest share of schools for both CMO- and EMO- managed charter schools, with neither serving more than 17% of rural or town schools.
CMOs and EMOs operate mainly in urban and suburban communities respectively.

Table 5.3: Locale by Management Type School Share

Most charter schools operate in urban areas, regardless of management type.

TOP TAKEAWAYS

70.1% of CMO-managed charter schools are located in urban areas.
52.6% of freestanding charter schools operate in urban areas.
EMO-managed schools serve urban and suburban communities more or less equally, 48.7% and 42.3% respectively.

Table 5.4: Management Type by Locale School Share

In 2024-25, twenty CMOs and EMOs manage schools that enrolled 21% of all charter school students nationwide.

A total of 304 CMOs and 57 EMOs supported charter schools in 2024-25.

The 10 largest CMOs manage schools that enroll 11% of students.

The 10 largest EMOs manage schools that enroll 11% of students.

The 10 largest EMOs account for 80% of all charter students enrolled in EMO-managed schools.

The 10 largest CMOs account for 35% of all charter students enrolled in CMO-managed schools.
KIPP is the largest CMO in the United States, supporting schools that enroll more than 118,000 students across 21 states and Washington DC.
Stride, Inc is the largest EMO and supports schools that enroll more than 95,000 students across 17 states.

Note: this section contains data only for CMOs and EMOs that do not subcontract with other management organizations.

Table 5.5: Top 10 CMOs by Enrollment, 2024-25

Table 5.6: Top 10 EMOs by Enrollment, 2024-25

CMO supported schools enroll the highest share of Black and Hispanic students (75.8%) across all management types, as well as the highest proportion of students of color overall (85.2%) .

TOP TAKEAWAYS

Black students make up 27.1% of the student population managed by CMOs, and Hispanic students make up 48.7% of students in CMO-managed schools. 
Freestanding and EMO-supported schools enroll predominantly Hispanic and White students, both enrolling similar shares of both groups.
85.2% of students enrolled in CMO-managed charter schools are students of color compared to 74.3% of students in EMO-managed schools and 68.2% of students in freestanding schools.

Table 5.7: Student Demographics by Management Type

Like individual schools, CMO and EMO networks can also subcontract with CMOs and EMOs. Some examples of this management arrangement are illustrated below:

EMOs like Academica, which provides a range of services to schools, work with both individual schools and CMO networks (e.g. Somerset Academy, Mater Academy, Pinecrest Academy, SLAM, and Doral Academy)

Other examples of this type of relationship include the CMO BASIS Charter Schools which contracts with the EMO BASIS Ed.

American Charter Schools Foundation and Kaizen Education Foundation are both CMOs who contract with the EMO, The Leona Group.
American Leadership Academy, a CMO with schools in several states, contracts with the EMO, Charter One.